Key Factors in Plastic Selection for Injection Moulding
Choosing the right plastic for injection moulding starts with understanding the mechanical properties you need. Consider tensile strength, impact resistance, and flexibility—these determine how well the part will perform under stress, shock, or bending. For example, if your part needs to withstand strong forces or sudden impacts, look for high-tensile or impact-resistant materials.
Next, thermal properties are crucial. Check the melt temperature because it affects processing conditions and cycle time. Heat deflection temperature tells you how well the plastic holds up under heat during use. Parts exposed to high temperatures need materials with higher heat resistance to avoid deformation.
Chemical resistance matters depending on your application. Some plastics handle oils, acids, or solvents better than others. Also, think about the environment—outdoor parts require UV resistance or weatherproof characteristics.
Balancing cost versus performance is always a challenge. Sometimes a cheaper plastic fits the bill, but if durability or safety matters, spending more on an engineering resin might save money long term.
Finally, ensure your chosen plastic meets regulatory compliance. For medical or food-contact products, FDA approval is essential. RoHS and REACH regulations impact electronics and European markets, so verify certifications to avoid costly remakes or legal issues.
By weighing mechanical, thermal, chemical, economic, and regulatory factors, you’ll select the best plastic that fits your injection moulding project perfectly.
The 7 Most Common Plastics for Injection Moulding
Choosing the right plastic for injection moulding depends on your product needs. Here are the top 7 plastics commonly used in the US market, with their key properties, typical uses, and Jino’s processing tips to get you started.
Polypropylene (PP)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 0.90 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 320–350°F (160–177°C) |
| Shrinkage | 1.0–2.0% |
Applications: Automotive parts, packaging, consumer goods like containers and household items.
Pros: Low cost, good chemical resistance, flexible.
Cons: Moderate strength, can degrade in UV exposure.
Jino Tip: Use controlled cooling to manage shrinkage and prevent warpage.
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 1.04 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 392–464°F (200–240°C) |
| Shrinkage | 0.4–0.7% |
Applications: Electronics housings, toys, automotive interior trims.
Pros: High impact resistance, good surface finish, easy to machine.
Cons: Flammable in standard grades; flame-retardant grades are available.
Jino Tip: Consider flame-retardant grades for electronics to meet safety requirements.
Polyethylene (HDPE/LDPE)
| Property | HDPE | LDPE |
|---|---|---|
| Density | 0.95 g/cm³ | 0.91 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 260–285°F (127–140°C) | 220–275°F (104–135°C) |
| Shrinkage | 1.5–3.0% | 2.0–5.0% |
Applications: Bottles, pipes, medical device components.
Pros: Excellent chemical resistance, highly recyclable.
Cons: Lower rigidity compared with engineering plastics.
Jino Tip: Choose HDPE when strength matters; LDPE for flexibility and softer parts.
Polycarbonate (PC)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 1.20 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 480–500°F (249–260°C) |
| Shrinkage | 0.4–0.7% |
Applications: Safety shields, lenses, medical equipment parts.
Pros: Outstanding impact strength, optical clarity.
Cons: More expensive, sensitive to UV light.
Jino Tip: Use higher injection speeds for clear parts to avoid flow lines.
Polyamide (Nylon 6/6, Nylon 6)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 1.13 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 480–530°F (250–276°C) |
| Shrinkage | 0.7–1.2% |
Applications: Gears, bearings, automotive engine components.
Pros: Strong, wear-resistant, good thermal stability.
Cons: Absorbs moisture, which affects dimensions and properties.
Jino Tip: Pre-dry material thoroughly to reduce moisture absorption and warping.
Polyoxymethylene (POM/Acetal)
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 1.41 g/cm³ |
| Melt Temp | 374–392°F (190–200°C) |
| Shrinkage | 1.0–2.5% |
Applications: Precision gears, fuel system parts, industrial components.
Pros: Excellent dimensional stability, low friction.
Cons: Can degrade with prolonged acid exposure.
Jino Tip: Use tight process controls to maintain close tolerances.
Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPE)
| Property | Value Range |
|---|---|
| Density | 0.85–1.3 g/cm³ |
| Hardness | Shore A 20 – Shore D 70 |
Applications: Seals, grips, overmoulded parts.
Pros: Flexible, soft-touch feel, recyclable.
Cons: Lower heat resistance than rigid plastics.
Jino Tip: Match shore hardness to application for best performance.
Each of these common injection moulding materials balances cost, mechanical performance, and processing needs. At Jino Injection Moulding, we help select the right resin for your product, ensuring smooth production and the best end-use results.
Material Comparison Matrix

Here's a quick overview of the most common plastics used in injection moulding, focusing on their strength, flexibility, cost, temperature resistance, chemical resistance, and typical industries:
| Material | Strength | Flexibility | Cost | Temp Resistance | Chemical Resistance | Typical Industries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polypropylene (PP) | Medium | High | Low | Moderate (320°F) | Good | Automotive, packaging, consumer |
| ABS | High | Medium | Medium | Moderate (220°F) | Fair | Electronics, toys, automotive |
| Polyethylene (HDPE/LDPE) | Medium | High (LDPE) | Low | Low-Moderate | Excellent | Bottles, pipes, medical |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | Very High | Low-Medium | High | High (300°F+) | Good | Safety gear, lenses, medical |
| Polyamide (Nylon 6/6) | High | Medium | Medium-High | High (260°F) | Good (sensitive to moisture) | Gears, bearings, automotive |
| Polyoxymethylene (POM) | High | Low | Medium | Moderate | Excellent | Precision parts, fuel systems |
| Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPE) | Low-Medium | Very High | Medium | Low-Moderate | Fair | Seals, grips, overmoulding |
Key Takeaways:
- Cost vs. Performance: PP and polyethylene are cost-effective choices for high-volume parts with less demanding conditions.
- Durability: PC and POM shine in high-strength, heat-resistant applications.
- Flexibility: TPE stands out for flexible, soft-touch parts.
- Chemical Resistance: Polyethylene and POM offer the best resistance in harsh environments.
This matrix helps you quickly pick the right injection moulding material for your project needs, balancing technical properties with costs and application demands common in the U.S. market.
Emerging & Specialty Materials

As injection moulding evolves, so do the materials. Bio-based PLA (Polylactic Acid) is gaining ground as an eco-friendly option, especially for packaging and consumer products where biodegradability matters. When durability and high performance are a must, engineering plastics like PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) and PEI (Polyetherimide) stand out—offering exceptional heat resistance, chemical stability, and strength.
Filled composites, such as those reinforced with glass or carbon fiber, bring added stiffness and impact resistance without too much weight. These specialty materials are ideal for advanced automotive parts, aerospace components, and medical devices.
When to Upgrade from Commodity to Engineering Resins
- Demand higher heat resistance or chemical resistance
- Require better mechanical strength or dimensional stability
- Need materials compliant with strict regulations (FDA, RoHS, REACH)
- Facing performance limits with standard plastics like PP or ABS
Switching to engineering resins means higher material costs but better long-term value through improved product durability and fewer rejects. It’s worth evaluating your product needs and manufacturing goals before making the jump.
How Jino Injection Moulding Optimizes Material Selection
At Jino Injection Moulding, we make material selection simple and smart for your projects. Our advanced material testing lab lets us analyze plastics thoroughly—checking mechanical strength, thermal behavior, and chemical resistance—so we recommend the best injection moulding materials for your needs.
We also perform detailed Design for Manufacturability (DFM) reviews. This means we look at your design early on to spot any issues with shrinkage, warpage, or processing costs. Catching these early saves time and money while ensuring a smoother production run.
Here’s a real-world example: by switching a client’s part from Polypropylene (PP) to High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE), we cut material costs by over 15%. The switch also improved recyclability and reduced cycle time, without sacrificing part quality—demonstrating how smart material choices can boost both performance and savings.
At Jino, this blend of lab testing and practical experience helps us optimize your material use, balancing cost, quality, and compliance.
Common Material Selection Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
Picking the right plastic for injection molding isn't always straightforward. Here are some common mistakes to watch out for:
- Over-specifying expensive resins: Sometimes using high-end, costly materials isn’t necessary. Overusing engineering-grade polymers instead of more affordable, suitable options like polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE) can inflate costs without real benefits.
- Ignoring shrinkage and warpage: Every plastic shrinks differently as it cools. Not accounting for shrinkage rates can cause parts to be the wrong size or shape. Warpage issues can also lead to rejects. Always check the material's shrinkage data and adjust the mold design accordingly.
- Neglecting secondary operations compatibility: Materials react differently to processes like painting, plating, or ultrasonic welding. If you don’t consider how your chosen polymer interacts with these finishes or assembly methods, you could face cracking, poor adhesion, or other problems down the line.