Gate Blush \/ Jetting<\/strong><\/td>\n| Excessive shear or free resin squirt<\/td>\n | Slow down initial injection velocity; increase gate land radius.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nSAN vs Other Clear Resins in Injection Moulding<\/h2>\nChoosing the right resin for clear plastic injection molding comes down to balancing part clarity, chemical resilience, and tooling cycle efficiency. While several transparent polymers look identical on the shelf, their processing behavior and field performance vary drastically. As a professional injection molding manufacturer and supplier, we regularly guide clients through material trade-offs to hit performance targets without inflating production budgets.<\/p>\n \n\n\n| Property \/ Feature<\/th>\n | SAN (\u0633\u062a\u0627\u064a\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0623\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0644\u0648\u0646\u064a\u062a\u0631\u064a\u0644)<\/th>\n | GPPS (\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0633\u062a\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062a\u062e\u062f\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645)<\/th>\n | PMMA (\u0623\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0643)<\/th>\n | PC (\u0628\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062a)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n | \n\nOptical Transmission<\/strong><\/td>\n| ~87% \u2013 90%<\/td>\n | ~88% \u2013 90%<\/td>\n | ~92% (Highest)<\/td>\n | ~88% \u2013 89%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n\u0642\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0623\u062b\u064a\u0631<\/strong><\/td>\n| \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0633\u0637<\/td>\n | Very Low \/ Brittle<\/td>\n | \u0645\u0646\u062e\u0641\u0636 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0639\u062a\u062f\u0644<\/td>\n | \u0645\u0631\u062a\u0641\u0639 \u0644\u0644\u063a\u0627\u064a\u0629<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0627\u0648\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a\u0645\u064a\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0629<\/strong><\/td>\n| High (fats, oils, detergents)<\/td>\n | \u0633\u064a\u0621<\/td>\n | \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0633\u0637<\/td>\n | Poor (solvents, alkaline)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nScratch Resistance<\/strong><\/td>\n| \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0633\u0637<\/td>\n | \u0645\u0646\u062e\u0641\u0636<\/td>\n | \u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a<\/td>\n | Low (requires coating)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMelt Flow & Processing<\/strong><\/td>\n| High stability, fast cycles<\/td>\n | Fast cycles, easy flow<\/td>\n | Stiffer melt, longer pack<\/td>\n | High temp, high pressure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0643\u0644\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0633\u0628\u064a\u0629 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062f\u0629<\/strong><\/td>\n| \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0633\u0637<\/td>\n | \u0645\u0646\u062e\u0641\u0636<\/td>\n | \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0633\u0637 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a<\/td>\n | \u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nSAN vs GPPS: Strength and Chemical Resistance vs Material Cost<\/h3>\nGPPS is the baseline for budget-friendly clear mouldings, but it fractures under light mechanical loads and degrades quickly around household oils or cleansers. In SAN vs GPPS polystyrene evaluations:<\/p>\n \n\n- Mechanical durability:<\/strong> The acrylonitrile component in SAN elevates tensile strength and surface hardness, preventing the spiderweb cracking common in GPPS.<\/li>\n
- Chemical exposure:<\/strong> SAN easily handles greasy food products, cosmetics, and industrial detergents that turn GPPS cloudy or brittle.<\/li>\n
- Economics:<\/strong> While GPPS offers a lower upfront raw resin price, SAN significantly cuts warranty and drop-test failures in durable goods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n
SAN vs PMMA: Impact Tolerance vs Optical Transparency and Scratch Resistance<\/h3>\nIn the debate of SAN vs PMMA acrylic, the choice hinges on whether your product demands ultra-pure optical transmission or structural resilience:<\/p>\n \n\n- Clarity and hardness:<\/strong> PMMA remains the gold standard for optical clarity injection moulding and scratch resistance, making it ideal for precision display panels and luxury cosmetic lenses.<\/li>\n
- Toughness and flex:<\/strong> PMMA is inherently notch-sensitive and snaps easily under sudden shock. SAN absorbs impact shock far better without shattering.<\/li>\n
- Moulding window:<\/strong> SAN flows with less shear sensitivity and solidifies faster, allowing shorter cooling times and fewer optical knit lines than PMMA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n
SAN vs Polycarbonate: Processability and Cost-Efficiency vs Extreme Impact Strength<\/h3>\nPolycarbonate delivers virtually unbreakable structural strength, but that toughness comes with severe manufacturing and financial trade-offs:<\/p>\n \n\n- Energy and cycle efficiency:<\/strong> PC requires high melt temperatures (often exceeding 300\u00b0C) and extreme injection pressures, which drives up equipment wear and cycle times. SAN processes at considerably lower barrel temperatures, trimming cycle seconds off high-volume production runs.<\/li>\n
- Stress cracking:<\/strong> PC suffers from catastrophic environmental stress cracking when exposed to common industrial greases, aromatic hydrocarbons, or aggressive cleaners. SAN displays superior solvent and grease resistance under load.<\/li>\n
- Bottom-line economy:<\/strong> Specifying PC when extreme impact resistance is not required unnecessarily raises your overall
| | | | | | | |